explicitly define backward & forward secrecy
as it repeatedly trips people up, including me
This commit is contained in:
parent
a18a4e8eb4
commit
f8abaf9e2f
1 changed files with 19 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -267,8 +267,16 @@ future research.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Lack of Backward Secrecy
|
### Lack of Backward Secrecy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Once the key to a Megolm session is compromised, the attacker can decrypt any
|
[Backward secrecy](https://intensecrypto.org/public/lec_08_hash_functions_part2.html#sec-forward-and-backward-secrecy)
|
||||||
future messages sent via that session.
|
(also called 'future secrecy' or 'post-compromise security') is the property
|
||||||
|
that if current private keys are compromised, an attacker cannot decrypt
|
||||||
|
future messages in a given session. In other words, when looking
|
||||||
|
**backwards** into the past at a compromise, messages sent since the compromise
|
||||||
|
will be secret.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
By itself, Megolm does not posess this property: once the key to a Megolm
|
||||||
|
session is compromised, the attacker can decrypt any future messages sent via
|
||||||
|
that session.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In order to mitigate this, the application should ensure that Megolm sessions
|
In order to mitigate this, the application should ensure that Megolm sessions
|
||||||
are not used indefinitely. Instead it should periodically start a new session,
|
are not used indefinitely. Instead it should periodically start a new session,
|
||||||
|
@ -279,7 +287,15 @@ with new keys shared over a secure channel.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Partial Forward Secrecy
|
### Partial Forward Secrecy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each recipient maintains a record of the ratchet value which allows them to
|
[Forward secrecy](https://intensecrypto.org/public/lec_08_hash_functions_part2.html#sec-forward-and-backward-secrecy)
|
||||||
|
is the property that if the current private keys are compromised, an attacker
|
||||||
|
cannot decrypt *past* messages in a given session (unless past private keys
|
||||||
|
are retained). 'Perfect forward secrecy' means that no past keys are retained.
|
||||||
|
'Partial forward secrecy' means that some past key data may be retained. In
|
||||||
|
other words, when looking **forwards** into the future at a potential
|
||||||
|
compromise, messages sent prior to the compromise will be secret.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In Megolm, each recipient maintains a record of the ratchet value which allows them to
|
||||||
decrypt any messages sent in the session after the corresponding point in the
|
decrypt any messages sent in the session after the corresponding point in the
|
||||||
conversation. If this value is compromised, an attacker can similarly decrypt
|
conversation. If this value is compromised, an attacker can similarly decrypt
|
||||||
those past messages.
|
those past messages.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue