diff --git a/docs/megolm.md b/docs/megolm.md
index b9eedec..ec98001 100644
--- a/docs/megolm.md
+++ b/docs/megolm.md
@@ -267,8 +267,17 @@ future research.
 
 ### Lack of Backward Secrecy
 
-Once the key to a Megolm session is compromised, the attacker can decrypt any
-future messages sent via that session.
+[Backward secrecy](https://intensecrypto.org/public/lec_08_hash_functions_part2.html#sec-forward-and-backward-secrecy)
+(also called 'future secrecy' or 'post-compromise security') is the property
+that if current private keys are compromised, an attacker cannot decrypt
+future messages in a given session.  In other words, when looking
+**backwards** in time at a compromise which has already happened, **current**
+messages are still secret.
+
+By itself, Megolm does not possess this property: once the key to a Megolm
+session is compromised, the attacker can decrypt any message that was
+encrypted using a key derived from the compromised or subsequent ratchet
+values.
 
 In order to mitigate this, the application should ensure that Megolm sessions
 are not used indefinitely. Instead it should periodically start a new session,
@@ -279,10 +288,18 @@ with new keys shared over a secure channel.
 
 ### Partial Forward Secrecy
 
-Each recipient maintains a record of the ratchet value which allows them to
-decrypt any messages sent in the session after the corresponding point in the
-conversation. If this value is compromised, an attacker can similarly decrypt
-those past messages.
+[Forward secrecy](https://intensecrypto.org/public/lec_08_hash_functions_part2.html#sec-forward-and-backward-secrecy)
+(also called 'perfect forward secrecy') is the property that if the current
+private keys are compromised, an attacker cannot decrypt *past* messages in
+a given session. In other words, when looking **forwards** in time towards a
+potential future compromise, **current** messages will be secret.
+
+In Megolm, each recipient maintains a record of the ratchet value which allows
+them to decrypt any messages sent in the session after the corresponding point
+in the conversation. If this value is compromised, an attacker can similarly
+decrypt past messages which were encrypted by a key derived from the
+compromised or subsequent ratchet values. This gives 'partial' forward
+secrecy.
 
 To mitigate this issue, the application should offer the user the option to
 discard historical conversations, by winding forward any stored ratchet values,